THE IMAGIST Search Archives Contact   

CURRENT VIEWING: MANDINGO: LEGEND FILMS

Mandingo starring Ken Norton addresses the trauma of race in AmericaMandingo starring Ken Norton addresses the trauma of race in America

I once got in big trouble while having a conversation with a friend when I blurted " OK. I'm into being very ahistorical right now. A black person is just a standard issue human being tinted a different color with slightly different features and a different cultural history. Basically you just get a human being capable of all the brilliance or all the vileness that all human beings are capable of". It was my way of trying to move away from the eternal narrative of oppression that colors all conversation about race. I was trying to articulate an idea...that...race is a detail not a final summary. I really pissed off my friend because he thought I was being blithe and therefore disrespectful of the history of racism in America. "You can't just pretend that something that exists, DOESN'T exist" he countered. Well this weekend I saw this film, "Mandingo", shot in 1975 by Richard Fleischer. It stars the boxer Ken Norton as "Mede" a magnificent and prized Mandingo trained by his owner to be a boxer and treasured precisely because his anticipated virility. Let's say that greatly anticipated virility triggers all sorts of plantation melodrama leading to a medley of deaths at the end.
The first thing I thought when the film ended was that artist Kara Walker's work suddenly made enormous sense to me. I now got (in a way I did not before) the brilliance in her harnessing that very 19th century technique, the cut-out silhouette to articulate her horror at the nightmarish narrative emitted by a very 19th century concept of race. In that 19th century narrative, "blacks" are sub-human.In the 21 st century I have the luxury of looking back at that as a sign of sheer idiocy. Human is human . The second thing that occured to me was how the film gave me an understanding of the efficiency of racism as a strategy . In other words I came to grasp its insidious way of justifying the complete exploitation of another human being. You simply argue that this other human...is not human.
Throughout "Mandingo" African-Americans are discussed as and treated as cattle. The language of the time as captured in the screenplay is both eerie and oddly poetic and it reminded me of the power language has in convincing people as to what they should be or what they wish to project. What was even stranger was my being forced to confront the idea that even though what I was watching was fiction, it evoked the very real behavior from a very real time in American history.
Through "Mandingo" I could see the codes of authority and the counter-code of anger that trapped both the oppressor and the oppressed in a pantomime of lies that came to represent a truth for some people. America still struggles to this day with the consequences in investing in that pantomime. I vaguely recall a quote from Thomas Jefferson, to the effect that slavery was possibly the worst idea the young nation of America could ever have engaged itself in. Of course Jefferson invested in the idea himself but that was the tincture of the time and people could not seem to think past a pantomime that since devolved into the traumatic shadow-memories that haunts the American psyche to this day. Just ask Kara Walker.
You don't have to deny history to transcend it. You can look at it, analyse it, defuse it and put it in perspective with understanding. I've never believed in racism. Racism for me is a chance to excercise an exacting mental discipline to remind myself of two things...1. We are not obliged to live with the lies of the past . That's the great luxury of looking towards the future no? 2. The other side of it is ...in our own century we can coin new ways of thinking. I really think this is possible.

Child Pleeeeeeeeease

" I've never believed in racism"... lol... I suggest you put down that Italian Vogue, and take a trip down south, go to middle America in those skiny jeans and dior jacket, drive a porche or a BMW down any main Highway in this lovely country of ours , visit some urban High schools, and then compare them to the High schools in the suburbs, take a look at the majority of young blk men that are currently incarcerated in comparison to their white cunteparts.. I can go on and on.. Oh and take a second glance at alot of these fashion rags that you so covet.. how many editors, photographers, hair+makeup, models, of color do you see. Wayne, really your comment is so banal. I understand this whole idea of transending race, because really that's what you have to do in this world to be accepted, you dont want to be seen as the "angry black man" that's not chic.. but honey really.. you have never believed in racism. WOW.. keep it up, you will be at Vogue soon...

Read carefully...

In your eagerness to read you didn't read carefully . I'm not dumb or delusional enough to NOT know racism exists.... Racism exists and racism is vile in the way it unfairly restricts the lives of tens of millions but what I don't believe is that central tenet of racism ...which is that anyone is inherently inferior to anyone else . If someone walks up to me and says "you are inferior because you are black" and I choose to NOT to internalize that piece of rubbish then what's the problem? If I chose not to give it power. Then what is the problem? Anger is one of the options given to me. But so is autonomy. Do I think racism is a fatal condition from which America will never recover? I don't believe that. I believe the world can change, is changing, has changed, will continue to change because the basic context of that change is in the WAY YOU CHOOSE TO THINK. That is what I mean in my statement which you seem to have to misinterpreted.
I aspire (though I often fail) to focus my energy in being as clear and calm and independent and elegant and productive in my life as possible. It's difficult but I'm obliged to keep trying. Fashion is full of people who think being bitchy, nasty, shady, evil, catty and vile is what amounts to being powerful. That's another thing I don't believe in . That's my theory of transcendence ..not only of race..but of any kind of negativity anyone puts in my path. I will not allow it to live in in my head.
Speaking of which...since apparently you think you know me (cuz yeah I do skinny jeans and Dior jackets ) keep it real
and put your name on your post . Cuz I'm real enough to say what I think with my name on it. If you choose to take issue with my point of view do that with some courage.
Feel me?

I feel you

Dear Mr. Wayne,

Thank you for your reply. I would hope that you aspire more energy on being clear in your statements, because it is put out in a forum for people to read and response, in my case interpret. Re: putting my name on my post? WHY?
Most readers and posters don't when they leave a comment, it doesn't solve anything, you will still feel the same way about my comments, plus that's what fun about these blogs ( you all know it) you can be anonymous. Im not trying to pick a fight with you Mr. Wayne.. I was just voicing my opinion on your post, thats what this forum is for right?

FYI: I have never met you, from reading your blog it was easy to assume your preference in style. It was a lucky guess..

N.S.'s picture

Unfortunately

You still have not grasped the point. Wayne's post was clear enough.
You had already made up your mind and that was that.
Isn't it obvious enough as to why you'd atleast join up or use a name? You have such a strong view and so much to say..one would imagine that you'd want to lay claim on your point.

Wayne, you kept it so real. Thank you
N.S. ;-)

?

aahh, I read the post and I also was a bit taken a back by Wayne's comment. After reading his response to the posters comment, then yes, it makes more sense. Waynes post was clear enough to YOU.

Taste is a dictatorship.

Recent comments

Syndicate

Syndicate content

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 34 guests online.